One check-in, and everyone is covered
The same check-in that locates a man's work is his attendance — godown, office and field staff alike. No register, no machine, no second system.
Three kinds of staff, three kinds of attendance, none of them agreeing
The office signs a register.
Three systems, or two, or none; reconciling them is month-end work, and the man whose day was hardest to see is the one least recorded.
The office
Signs a register at the gate, which somebody types up at month-end.
The godown
Punches a machine on the wall, if there is one.
The field team
Has nothing at all — you cannot bolt a biometric machine to a scooter. The hardest day to see is the least recorded.
Attendance is a by-product here, not a system
That same action is the attendance record. Check-in and check-out, with place and time, covering godown, office and field staff alike.
Two or three of them — a register, a machine, and nothing for the field
Reconciled at month-end — which is work somebody does every month, forever
And still incomplete — the man on the road stays unrecorded
One check-in, already there — the godown man declares his building; the rep checks in at a counter
Godown, office and field alike — in, out, place and time
Nothing to reconcile — because there is only one record
One mechanism, everyone covered, already running for reasons that have nothing to do with attendance.
Every check-in leaves a stamp
In, out, where, when — the act itself makes the record.
Simplification, not surveillance
This page makes a small promise and keeps it: one fewer system to run.
Attendance stops being its own machinery and becomes a fact the day already produces — read it when payroll needs it, and spend the saved reconciliation on something that earns money.
See one day's attendance fall out of one day's work.
Ask for a demo